Turn approved weekly metrics into a short digest of material movements, evidence, hypotheses, owners, and next checks.
Instructions your experts follow when using this skill.
Use one fixed reporting window, comparison rule, and metric definition set. A digest should help a team decide where to look, not list every number available.
Record the current and comparison periods, timezone, extract time, metric version, target or materiality threshold, and source owner. Run the required quality checks before interpreting changes. Mark late or incomplete metrics.
Include a metric when it crosses the agreed absolute, relative, target, or quality threshold. For each selected metric show:
FACT, HYPOTHESIS, or OPEN explanation;Do not rank by percentage change alone. A small base, denominator shift, changed definition, or late data can make a large percentage misleading.
Start with data health. Then give three to seven material moves, decisions or help needed, and an appendix of stable metrics. Use the same order each week so readers can compare periods. Keep targets, forecasts, and actuals distinct.
If no metric crossed a threshold, say so and name any data-quality issue; do not create a story to fill the page.
Never invent a cause, suppress an unfavourable result, change a threshold after seeing the data, or publish personal row-level detail. Do not claim causation without a valid design. Route decisions with legal, privacy, clinical, credit, employment, or material finance impact to the named owner.
Phrases that help your experts find this skill.